Skip to content
No results
  • Biography
    • Biography – Long (En)
    • Biography – Short (En)
    • Biography – Short (Fr)
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • RFCs
    • Journals
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Book Chapters
    • Technical Reports
  • For Students
    • Office Hours
    • EuroTeQ Students
    • 3A/M1/M2 Internships
    • 4A “Hors Catalogue” (X students)
    • Recommendation Letters
    • Internship Candidates
  • For Colleagues
  • Contact Me
    • General Contact Information
    • Find Me On Campus
    • Collaborator Connection
Thomas Heide Clausen
  • Biography
    • Biography – Long (En)
    • Biography – Short (En)
    • Biography – Short (Fr)
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • RFCs
    • Journals
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Book Chapters
    • Technical Reports
  • For Students
    • Office Hours
    • EuroTeQ Students
    • 3A/M1/M2 Internships
    • 4A “Hors Catalogue” (X students)
    • Recommendation Letters
    • Internship Candidates
  • For Colleagues
  • Contact Me
    • General Contact Information
    • Find Me On Campus
    • Collaborator Connection
Thomas Heide Clausen

Fairly interesting reflections on peer reviewing: “The NIPS Experiment”

  • tclausentclausen
  • 2014-12-16
  • Academic process, Peer Review

Not sure to which degree these observations on the academic review process generalize, but they are interesting all the same: http://mrtz.org/blog/the-nips-experiment/.

Copyright © 2025 - WordPress Theme by CreativeThemes